Set number: 844

  • Furcatolithus distentus 129 1
  • Furcatolithus distentus 130 2
  • Furcatolithus distentus 127 3
  • Furcatolithus distentus 128 4
    10µm
Furcatolithus distentus, Early Oligocene, DSDP Leg 25, Site 242, Mozambique Channel (Davie Ridge), Indian Ocean

Set number: 845

  • Furcatolithus distentus 151 1
  • Furcatolithus distentus 152 2
  • Furcatolithus distentus 154 3
  • Furcatolithus distentus 153 4
    10µm
Furcatolithus distentus, Early Oligocene, DSDP Leg 25, Site 242, Mozambique Channel (Davie Ridge), Indian Ocean

Set number: 846

  • Furcatolithus distentus 182 1
  • Furcatolithus distentus 181 2
  • Furcatolithus distentus 179 3
  • Furcatolithus distentus 180 4
    10µm
Furcatolithus distentus, Early Oligocene, DSDP Leg 25, Site 242, Mozambique Channel (Davie Ridge), Indian Ocean
Final Epithet
Furcatolithus distentus Martini, 1965
Basionym

Furcatolithus distentus Martini, 1965

Synonyms

Sphenolithus distentus (Martini, 1965) Bramlette & Wilcoxon, 1967

Description

Small to medium size furcatolith having a duolithic biconical apical spine with or without bifurcation and a hollow moderately high cylindrical cone shape proximal cycle. In the axial section, the apical spine is kite shape with an obtuse angle at the proximal end. In cross-polarised light, the apical spine with axial c-axis shows maximum birefringence at 45° but extinct (dim) at 0° [the axial suture between the two helves is better seen at this orientation].

Remarks

Furcatolithus distentus and Furcatolithus ciperoensis (Bramlette & Wilcoxon, 1967) Howe, 2021 are both having kite shape apical spines in the axial section. They differ by the angle of the proximal end. Furcatolithus distentus have obtuse, whereas Furcatolithus ciperoensis have an acute angle at the proximal end.

In the axial section, the apical spine is conical in Furcatolithus celsus (Haq, 1971) Howe, 2021 and Furcatolithus predistentus Bramlette & Wilcoxon (1967) Howe, 2021, therefore boundary between the apical spine and the proximal cycle is flat.

References

Bergen, J. A., de Kaenel, E., Blair, S. A., Boesiger, T. M., Browning, E., 2017. Oligocene-Pliocene taxonomy and stratigraphy of the genus Sphenolithus in the circum North Atlantic Basin: Gulf of Mexico and ODP Leg 154. Journal of Nannoplankton Research 37(2-3), 77-112.

Bramlette, M. N., Wilcoxon, J. A., 1967. Middle Tertiary calcareous nannoplankton of the Cipero section, Trinidad, W.I. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology 5, 93-131.

Haq, B. U., 1971. Paleogene calcareous nannoflora. Parts I-IV. Stockholm Contributions in Geology 25, 1-158.

Howe, R., 2021. Ultrastructure and taxonomy of the family Sphenolithaceae. Journal of Nannoplankton Research 39(1), 29-75.

Martini, E., 1965. Mid-Tertiary calcareous nannoplankton from Pacific deep-sea cores. Colston Papers 17, 393-411.