Set number: 3107

  • Helenea staurolithina 13414 1
  • Helenea staurolithina 13416 2
  • Helenea staurolithina 13418 3
  • Helenea staurolithina 13426 4
  • Helenea staurolithina 13415 5
  • Helenea staurolithina 13417 6
  • Helenea staurolithina 13419 7
  • Helenea staurolithina 13427 8
  • Helenea staurolithina 13424 9
  • Helenea staurolithina 13423 10
  • Helenea staurolithina 13420 11
  • Helenea staurolithina 13425 12
  • Helenea staurolithina 13422 13
  • Helenea staurolithina 13421 14
    10µm
Helenea staurolithina, Late Aptian, Arabian Peninsula (The specific location cannot be disclosed)

Set number: 3106

  • Helenea staurolithina 11554 1
  • Helenea staurolithina 11556 2
  • Helenea staurolithina 11558 3
  • Helenea staurolithina 11555 4
  • Helenea staurolithina 11557 5
  • Helenea staurolithina 11559 6
    10µm
Helenea staurolithina, Middle Cenomanian, The specific location cannot be disclosed.

Set number: 3108

  • Helenea staurolithina 975 1
  • Helenea staurolithina 976 2
    10µm
Helenea staurolithina, Early Cenomanian, Mississippi Canyon, Gulf of Mexico
Final Epithet
Helenea staurolithina Worsley, 1971
Basionym

Helenea staurolithina Worsley, 1971

Variants

Microstaurus lindensis Black 1971a

Description

Large (>6.0 µm), normally elliptical species (ellipticity 1.2–1.3) of Helenea are characterised by an axial cross that may be slightly rotated relative to the axis of the placolith. The arms of the cross have bifurcated terminations and support a short distal process with a distinct square-shaped termination.

Optical Properties

The entire species exhibits first-order, slightly greyish-white interference colours. The pelaga of Helenea staurolithina exhibits inclined extinction and length-fast (-) elongation in its natural settling position, as seen in plan view under crossed polars.

Remarks

Helenea staurolithina differs from Helenea chiastia in that it is larger than 6.0 µm. Worsley (1971) noted in the remarks section for Helenea staurolithina that “H. staurolithina is differentiated from H. chiasta by its larger size and greater number of elements in the distal rim”. However, the number of segments (elements) cannot be accurately determined using the light microscope.

References

Black, M. 1971a. Coccoliths of the Speeton Clay and Sutterby Marl. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 38: 381-424.

Worsley, T. R., 1971. Calcareous nannofossil zonation of Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous sediments from the Western Atlantic. In: Farinacci, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Planktonic Conference Roma 1970. Edizioni Tecnoscienza, Rome vol. 2, pp. 1301-1321.